The Department acts as the government's legal adviser, providing legal counsel and support. It is responsible for providing legal advisory services and preparing legal documents for all federal government departments and agencies on a broad range of issues. The following table presents an overview of the Cycle II client feedback provided by the 4,504 service users who identified that they had received legal advisory services in the twelve months preceding the administration of the Survey. Presented for comparison purposes are the Cycle I results for legal advisory services.
| Cycle II (2012) | Cycle I (2009) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall quality of Legal Advisory Services provided. † | 8.4 (0.0) Strong |
8.2 (0.0) Positive |
| Cycle II (2012) | Cycle I (2009) | |
|---|---|---|
| Official languages: Please rate your overall level of satisfaction with the accessibility of legal services in the official language of your choice. | 9.3 (0.0) Strong |
9.5 (0.0) Strong |
| Courteousness/Respectfulness: Please rate your overall level of satisfaction with the courteousness/respectfulness of legal service providers. | 9.1 (0.0) Strong |
9.2 (0.0) Strong |
| Service Provider: Please rate your level of satisfaction with the ease with which the correct service provider to meet your needs was identified. | 8.6 (±0.1) Strong |
n/a |
| Satisfaction with access mode: Electronic. | 8.7 (±0.1) Strong |
n/a |
| Satisfaction with access mode: Telephone. | 8.7 (±0.1) Strong |
n/a |
| Satisfaction with access mode: In person. | 8.8 (±0.1) Strong |
n/a |
| Regularly provided informative progress reports or ongoing feedback informing you of the status of your request for services. † | 7.2 (±0.1) Opportunities for Improvement |
7.5 (±0.1) Moderate |
| Cycle II (2012) | Cycle I (2009) | |
|---|---|---|
| Fully understood the nature of the problem/issue for which you received assistance. † | 8.3 (±0.1) Positive |
8.5 (±0.1) Strong |
| Advised you of issues/developments which may impact your department/agency. † | 8.2 (±0.1) Positive |
8.4 (±0.1) Strong |
| Worked with you to identify legal risks. | 8.3 (±0.1) Positive |
8.3 (±0.1) Positive |
| Involved you in the review/development of legal options to mitigate identified legal risks. | 7.9 (±0.1) Positive |
n/a |
| Involved you in the development of legal strategy and positions. | 7.7 (±0.1) Moderate |
7.8 (±0.1) Moderate |
| Identified means to prevent or resolve legal disputes at the earliest opportunity. † | 7.9 (±0.1) Positive |
8.1 (±0.1) Positive |
| Identified opportunities to use dispute resolution practices, where appropriate. † | 7.7 (±0.1) Moderate |
8.0 (±0.1) Positive |
| Provided clear and practical guidance on resolving the legal issue. | 8.1 (±0.1) Positive |
8.1 (±0.1) Positive |
| Provided consistent legal advice. | 8.3 (±0.1) Positive |
n/a |
| Cycle II (2012) | Cycle I (2009) | |
|---|---|---|
| Responded in a timely manner to requests for legal services. | 7.7 (±0.1) Moderate |
7.8 (±0.1) Moderate |
| Negotiated mutually agreed-upon deadlines. † | 7.7 (±0.1) Moderate |
7.9 (±0.1) Positive |
| Met mutually agreed-upon deadlines. | 7.9 (±0.1) Positive |
8.0 (±0.1) Positive |
† Denotes a statistically significant difference between Cycle II and Cycle I client feedback.
In assessing the overall quality of the legal advisory services provided, overall client satisfaction has significantly improved since Cycle I, receiving a “strong” rating of 8.4 out of 10. Moreover and consistent with the findings from Cycle I, the Cycle II results indicate that the Department is generally in line with or surpassing the departmental target of 8.0 on the additional nineteen elements relating to legal advisory services.
There are four specific elements where the client feedback was “moderate” – falling slightly below the established target. Specifically, these include:
Against the following Service Standard, client satisfaction has decreased from 7.5 in Cycle I to 7.2 in Cycle II, with feedback indicating that there may be “opportunity for improvement”: