The term "identity theft" can refer to the preliminary steps of collecting, possessing, and trafficking in identity information for the purpose of eventual use in existing crimes such as personation, fraud, or misuse of debit card or credit card data. Identity theft in this sense is different from "identity fraud", i.e., the subsequent actual deceptive use of the identity information of another person in connection with various crimes. Identity theft takes place in advance of, and in preparation for, identity fraud.
Identity theft is a serious criminal activity that is becoming increasingly lucrative and easily crosses borders. In 2007, more than 10,000 Canadian victims reported losses of more than $6M to PhoneBusters, the Canadian anti-fraud call centre. Between January 1, 2008 and October 31, 2008, more than 9000 Canadian victims of identity theft reported losses of more than $8M to PhoneBusters. The Canadian Council of Better Business Bureaus has estimated that identity theft may cost Canadian consumers, banks and credit card firms, stores and other businesses more than $2B annually.
The actual fraudulent and deceptive uses of other people's identities are already subject to strict criminal prohibitions. Bill S-4 creates three new "core" identity theft offences targeting the early stages of identity-related crime, all subject to 5-year maximum prison sentences:
Additional amendments include:
Moreover, a new power now permits the court to order, as part of a sentence, that an offender be required to pay restitution to a victim of identity theft or identity fraud for costs associated with their efforts to rehabilitate their identity, e.g., the cost of replacement cards, documents and correcting their credit history. This provision complements existing provisions which permit restitution to be ordered for actual economic or other property losses.
The legislation includes two exemptions to address potential negative impacts on the undercover work of law enforcement. The exemptions ensure that those who make false documents for covert government operations can do so without fear of prosecution for forgery, and that public officers (i.e., law enforcement personnel) can create and use covert identities in furtherance of their duties.
- 30 -
January 2010
Department of Justice