Department of Justice Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Skip to content | Skip to institutional links

Common menu bar links

Breadcrumb trail

  1. Home
  2. Programs and Initiatives
  3. Supporting Families

Institutional links


family justice

The Department of Justice Canada works to reduce family violence in Canada. Learn more...

Overview and Assessment of
Approaches to Access Enforcement

2001-FCY-8E

TABLE OF CASES

CANADA

  • A.B. v. N.R., [1998] Q.J. No. 3094 (Q.L.) (Super. Ct. (Fam. Div.))

  • Abdo v. Abdo (1993), 50 R.F.L. (3d) 171 (N.S.C.A.)

  • Agee v. Vellani, [1991] B.C.J. No. 3927 (Prov. Ct.)

  • Alexander v. Creary (1995), 14 R.F.L. (4th) 311 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)

  • Allen v. Grenier (1997), 145 D.L.R. (4th) 286 (Ont. Gen. Div.)

  • Al-Maghazachi v. Dueck, [1995] M.J. No. 406 (C.A.)

  • Alstrup v. MacDougall, [1998] N.S.J. No. 543 (Fam. Ct.)

  • Amaral v. Myke (1992), 42 R.F.L. (3d) 322 (Ont. U.F.C.)

  • B. v. D. (1998), 35 R.F.L. (4th) 241 (Ont. Prov. Div.)

  • B.A. v. D.M.A., [1996] O.J. No. 352 (Gen. Div.)

  • Baker v. Canada, [1997] 2 F.C. 127 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted September 4, 1997, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817

  • Brecht v. Martin (1996), 145 Sask R. 236 (Q.B.)

  • Breen v. Beaulieu (1988), 54 Man. R. (2d) 74 (Q.B.)

  • Brownell v. Brownell (1987), 9 R.F.L. (3d) 31 (N.B.Q.B. [Fam.Div.])

  • Burgoin v. Burgoin (1997), 35 R.F.L. (4th) 135 (Alta. C.A.)

  • Butson v. LaCombe (1984), 41 R.F.L. (2d) 222 (Ont. U.F.C.)

  • C.A.R. v. L.G., [1998] Q.J. No. 1987 (Sup. Ct. Fam. Div.)

  • C.C. v. L.B., [1995] N.J. No. 386 (U.F.C.)

  • C.M.C. v. G.W.C., [1997] B.C.J. No. 913 (S.C.)

  • Cadeau v. Martell, [1998] N.S.J. No. 159 (N.S. Fam. Ct.)

  • Casement v. Casement (1987), 81 A.R. 76 (Q.B.)

  • Chan v. Spencer, [1998] B.C.J. No. 1317 (Q.L.) (B.C.S.C.)

  • Clements v. Clements, [1999] S.J. No. 329, Div. No. 21 of 1998 J.C.R. (Q.B. Fam. Div.)

  • Cooper v. Cooper, [1995] A.J. No. 617 (Q.B.)

  • Cromwell v. Cromwell, [1994] O.J. No. 245 (Gen. Div.)

  • Cutts v. Cutts (1977), 7 Fam. Law. 209

  • D.A. v. T.L.A., [1996] O.J. No. 77 (Gen. Div.)

  • D.F.M. v. J.S.S. (1995), 17 R.F.L. (4th) 283 (Alta. C.A.)

  • D.(R.P.) v. C.(R.) (1993), 107 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 219, 336 A.P.R. 219 (Nfld. Prov. Ct.)

  • D.S. v. S.T.S., [1997] O.J. No. 4061 (Q.L.)

  • Dombroski v. Dombroski, [1993] A.J. No. 243 (Q.L.) (Q.B.)

  • Drake v. Cox (1993), 107 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 219 (Nfld. Prov. Ct.)

  • Droit de la famille--1120, [1987] R.D.F. 478 (C.S.)

  • E.H. v. T.G. (1995), 18 R.F.L. (4th) 21 (N.S.C.A.)

  • E.M.M. v. G.A.M., [1999] M.J. No. 566 (Q.B. (Fam. Div.))

  • Evin v. Evin, [1997] B.C.J. No. 2201 (S.C.)

  • F.K.H.W.B. v. F.S.M.W.B., [1995] N.S.J. 471 (Fam. Ct.)

  • Flemmings v. Collet, [1997] O.J. No. 1382 (Prov. Div.)

  • Frame v. Smith, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99

  • G.N.T. v. J.S.T., [1998] B.C.J. No. 925 (S.C.)

  • Genua v. Genua (1979), 12 R.F.L. (2d) 85 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)

  • Gilmaine v. Gilmaine, [1999] B.C.J. No. 104 (S.C.)

  • Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27

  • Grondin v. Dyni, [1992] O.J. No. 344 (Q.L.) (Gen. Div.)

  • H.A. v. D.M., [1995] O.J. No. 4021 (Q.L.) (Ont. Prov. Div.)

  • Halas v. Halas, [1998] B.C.J. No. 1515 (C.A.)

  • Harrison v. Harrison (1987), 51 Man. R. (2d) 16 (Q.B.)

  • Hayes v. Hayes (1990), 82 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 299

  • Huber v. Flegel, [1992] S.J. No. 278 (Q.B.)

  • Hume v. Hume (1989), 79 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 114 (P.E.I.S.C.T.D.)

  • Inwood v. Sidorova, [1991] O.J. No. 1417 (Gen. Div.)

  • Irmya v. Narso, [1996] O.J. No. 2501 (Prov. Div.)

  • Isfeld v. Daniels (1995), 103 Man. R. (2d) 312 (Q.B.)

  • J.V.M. v. M.P.S., [1997] B.C.J. No. 1631 (S.C.)

  • Jones v. Anhorn, [1998] B.C.J. No. 1274 (S.C.)

  • K.F.(D.) P. v. K.W.D., [1992] N.B.J. No. 234 (Q.B. Fam. Div.)

  • K.M.S. v. E.Z., [1997] S.J. No. 361 (Q.B.)

  • Kingwell v. Kingwell (1991), 35 R.F.L. (3d) 373 (Ont. Gen. Div.)

  • Koch v. Mitchell, [1999] B.C.J. No. 52 (B.C.C.A.)

  • L.B. v. R.D. (1998), 35 R.F.L. (4th) 241 (Ont. Prov. Div.)

  • L.(M.) v. R.(K.), [1996] W.D.F.L. 116 (Ont. Prov. Div.)

  • L.M.R. v. R.C.B., [1997] O.J. No. 4578 (Gen. Div.)

  • Lee v. Lee (1990), 29 R.F.L. (3d) 417 (B.C.C.A.)

  • Lund v. Gabe, [1995] B.C.J. No. 1903 (S.C.)

  • Matter of the Law Society, Re Solicitor, 29 September 1993, Report and Decision of the Discipline Committee of the Law Society of Upper Canada, excerpted in J.G. McLeod, Child Custody Law and Practice (Toronto: Carswell, 1992) looseleaf service, at 10-9 -10.10.3

  • M.v. M., [1996] B.C.J. No. 1161 (Q.L.) (S.C.)

  • M. (B.P.) v. M. (B.L.D.E.) (1992), 42 R.F.L. (3d) 349 (Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, [1993] 3 S.C.R. vii

  • M.P. v. G.L.B., [1995] 4 S.C.R. 592

  • MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, [1988] N.S.J. No. 517 (Q.L. (N.S. Fam. Ct.)

  • MacLeod v. MacLeod, [1996] N.S.J. No. 578 (Q.L.) (N.S.S.C.)

  • Marcil v. Stedmann, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2602 (S.C.)

  • McKee v. McKee, [1951] A.C. 352 (P.C.)

  • McNair v. Tetrault, [1995] O.J. No. 3044 (Q.L.) (Ct. Justice (Prov. Div.))

  • Miller v. Miller, [1998] A.J. No. 1191 (Q.B.)

  • Myatt v. Myatt, [1993] B.C.J. No. 215 (B.C.S.C.)

  • Newhook v. McEachern (1997), 161 N.S.R. (2d) 180 (N.F.S.C.)

  • O'Byrne v. Koresec (1986), 2 R.F.L. (3d) 104 (B.C.S.C.)

  • P.A. v. F.A., [1997] B.C.J. 1566 (S.C.)

  • P.H. v. D.G. (1994), 59 O.A.C. 19 (Prov. Div.)

  • Paton v. Shymkiw (1996), 114 Man. R. (2d) 303 (Q.B. [Fam. Div.])

  • Paynter v. Reynolds (1997), 157 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 336 (S.C. App. Div.)

  • Pollastro v. Pollastro, [1999] O.J. No. 911 (C.A.)

  • R. v. Clement, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 468

  • R. v. Dawson, [1995] N.S.J. No. 306 (C.A.)

  • R. v. Dawson, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 783

  • R. v. Petropoulos (1990), 29 R.F.L. (3d) 289 (B.C.C.A.)

  • R. v. R. (1979), 9 Fam. Law 56

  • R. v. R., [1997] B.C.J. No. 1623 (S.C.)

  • R.C.P.C. v. J.B.D., [1997] B.C.J. No. 1657 (S.C.)

  • R.L.G. v. S.A.F., [1999] S.J. No. 507 (Q.B. (Fam. L. Div.))

  • R.M.O. v. J.J.O., [1994] O.J. No. 2522 (Gen. Div.)

  • Re Leponiemi and Leponiemi (1982), 35 O.R. (2d) 440 (C.A.)

  • Rawlinson v. Rawlinson (1986), 5 R.F.L. (3d) 166 (Sask. Q.B.)

  • Reithofer v. Dingley, [2000] O.J. No. 1132 (Sup. Ct Just.)

  • Rheaume v. LeClair, [1993] O.J. No. 2380 (Q.L.) (Ont. C.J. Prov. Div.)

  • Richardson v. Richardson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 857

  • Rutherford v. Rutherford (1987), 4 R.F.L. (3d) 457 (B.C.S.C.)

  • S.E.H. v. S.R.M., [2000] B.C.J. No. 786 (S.C.)

  • S.F.R. v. E.C.R., [1997] B.C.J. No. 1830 (S.C.)

  • Salamon v. Salamon, [1997] O.J. No. 852 (Gen. Div.)

  • Salloum v. Salloum (1994), 154 A.R. 65 (Q.B.)

  • Sekhri v. Mahli (1993), 112 Sask. R. 253 29 (Q.B.)

  • Smith v. Smith, year 164 Sask. R. 50 (Q.B.)

  • Stupple v. Quinn (1990), 30 R.F.L. (3d) 197 (C.A.)

  • Sturkenboom v. Davies (1996), 25 R.F.L. (4th) 173 (Alta. C.A.)

  • Surette v. Thomas (1996), 13 O.T.C. 219 (Gen. Div.)

  • T.A. v. F.A., [1995] O.J. No. 2735 (Q.L.) (Prov. Div.)

  • Tanner v. Madore, [1992] N.J. No. 233

  • Thiele v. Thiele, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2214 (S.C.)

  • Thompson v. Brown, [1997] B.C.J. No. 2538 (S.C.)

  • Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 6 R.F.L. (4th) (S.C.C.)

  • Thorne v. Dryden-Hall, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1243 (C.A.)

  • Tremblay v. Tremblay (1987), 10 R.F.L. (3d) 166 (Alta. Q.B.)

  • Vandebyl v. Belko, [1992] O.J. No. 3091 (Q.L.) (Ont. C.J. (Prov. Div.))

  • W.A.H. v. S.M.L., [1997] N.S.J. No. 283 (Fam. Ct.)

  • W. (V.) v. S.(D.), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 108

  • Wall v. Wall, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2640 (S.C.)

  • Whipp v. Racz, [1997] O.J. No. 3433 (Q.L.) (Ont. Fam. Ct.)

  • White v. White, [1999] N.S.J. No. 312 (S.C.)

  • Williams v. Williams, [1998] A.J. No. 935 (Q.B.)

  • Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3

  • Zahr v. Zahr (1994), 24 Alta. L.R. (3d) 274 (Q.B.)

UNITED STATES

  • Bromley v. Bromley, 30 F. Supp. 2d 857 (Penn. U.S. Dist. Ct. 1988)

  • Casbergue v. Casbergue, 124 Mich. App. 491, 335 N.W.2d 16 (1983)

  • Gleiss v. Newman, 415 N.W.2d 845 (Wis. App. 1987)

  • Hancock v. Hancock, 471 S.E.2d 415 (N.C.App. 1996)

  • Hathcock v. Hathcock, 685 So.2d 736 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)

  • In re A.C., 643 So.2d 743 (La. 1994)

  • In re Marriage of Marshall, 663 N.E.2d 1113 (Ill. App. 3 Dist., 1996)

  • In re Tammy D Keaton, Relator (2000 WL 301189 (Tex. App., Amarillo))

  • Mintz v. Mintz, 64 N.C. App. 338, 307 S.E.2d 391 (1983)

  • Michigan v. McBride, 516 N.W.2d. 148 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995)

  • Mullin v. Phelps, 647 A.2d 714 (Vt. 1994)

  • Parker v. Ford, 453, N.Y.S. 2d 465 (App. Div. 1982)

  • Rufallo v. United States, 590 F. Supp 760 (Mo. 1984)

  • Santosky v. Kramer, 455 United States 745 (1982)

  • David S. v. Zamira, 151 Misc.2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam. Ct. 1991), aff'd In re Schnier, 17 F.L.R. 1237 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't)

  • State of Minnesota v. Maidi, 537 N.W.2d 280 (Minn. 1995)

  • Strother v. State of Alaska, 891 P.2d 214 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995)

  • Tangeman v. Tangeman (2000 WL 217284 (Ohio App. 2 Dist.))

  • Viragh v. Foldes, 612 N.E.2d 241 (Mass. 1993)

AUSTRALIA

  • Martin & Matruglio [1990] Fam CA 1785 (December 23, 1999) (Full Court of the Family Court of Australia)

ENGLAND

  • Ansah v. Ansah [1977] Fam 138

  • Re C (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 1 FLR 403, [1989] 1 W.L.R. 656 (C.A.)

  • Re H (Contact: Enforcement) [1996] 1 FLR 614 (Fam. Div.)

  • Re H (Contact: Domestic Violence) [1998] 2 FLR 42 (C.A.)

  • Re M (Contact: Welfare Test) [1995] 1 F.L.R. (C.A.)

  • Re M (Contact Order: Committal) [1999] 1 FLR 810 (C.A.)

  • A v. N (Committal: Refusal of Contact) [1997] Family Law 145 (C.A.)
Date Modified: 2012-08-03

Top of Page
Important Notices