Department of Justice
www.justice.gc.ca
The Department of Justice Canada works to reduce family violence in Canada. Learn more...
The Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family is conducting this survey as part of a project funded by the Department of Justice Canada. This survey is intended to obtain current information on the characteristics of cases handled by family law practitioners in Canada, and to obtain information from both lawyers and judges concerning family law issues. You may have completed a similar survey at the 2004 National Family Law Program in La Malbaie. This survey is being replicated this year to allow for the examination of trends in family law, and to allow practitioners to share their views about developments in family law, such as the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines.
We would appreciate your assistance in completing this survey. Please be assured that your anonymity will be maintained and that responses will not be attributed to individuals.
This project is intended to help increase understanding of areas that should be addressed in law reform. Family law practitioners have important perspectives, and you are encouraged to participate.
As an incentive for participating in this project, if you complete the survey, your name will be entered in a draw for one of several prizes, including: one waiver of the registration fee for the 2008 National Family Law Program; and ten copies of the most recent edition of Canadian Child Welfare Law: Children, Families and the State. To enter this draw, please complete the entry form attached to this page, remove it from the survey, and drop both the entry form and the completed survey off at the Conference Registration Desk before 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 12, 2006. The draw for the prizes will be made on Wednesday evening. Entry forms will be destroyed after the draws are made.
Thank you for your cooperation in completing this survey.
Please complete the following questions according to your experience. Where we ask you to specify a proportion of your cases, we realize that you cannot provide an exact figure; an approximation is fine. Where we ask you to estimate a frequency of occurrence, please use the following scale as a guideline:
Rarely = 0-10%; Occasionally = 10-50%; Often = 50-90%; Almost Always = 90-100%
If you would like to make additional comments for any question, please use the general comments page on the last page of the survey, and indicate the question to which your comment relates.1.1 In what province(s)/territory do you work? 
1.2 What is your profession?

1.3 If you are a lawyer, how long have you been practicing family law?
years
%1.4 Is your client base:
1.5 Are you registered with a lawyer referral service?
%1.6 If you are a lawyer, do you also conduct mediation sessions?
1.7 In the past five years, have you taken any training, including continuing education courses, on the following family law issues? (Please check all that apply.)

2.1 How many family law cases have you handled in the past year? 
2.2 What proportion of these cases involved children?
%
2.3 In what proportion of the family law cases that you have handled in the past year was either party funded by legal aid?
%
2.4 What proportion of your family law cases with children involved are variations of previous orders/agreements?
% [ Judges: Please go to Question 2.8 ]2.5 How would you classify the majority of your clients?
2.6 In what proportion of your cases in the past year was the final resolution of the case accomplished in the following ways?
%
%
%
%
%
%How frequently do you encourage your clients to seek resolutions outside court?
2.7 In what percent of your family law cases is there an interim order that is, in effect, the final judicial disposition, because the case is thereafter resolved without a trial?
%
2.8 In your experience, in a divorce case, which of the following issues are most likely to require a trial and judicial decision to be resolved? ( Please check all that apply. )
2.9 In your experience, in a variation case, which of the following issues are most likely to require a trial and judicial decision to be resolved? ( Please check all that apply. )
3.1 How do you keep informed about family justice services (i.e., services available to clients to assist them in family law matters, e.g., counselling, education, mediation etc.)? (Please check all that apply.)

Which of these sources is most helpful to you in keeping informed about family justice services?

3.2 In general, how well informed are your clients about the following at the outset of their case?
| Very well informed | Somewhat informed | Not at all informed | They are misinformed | N/A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriage or relationship counselling | |||||
| Individual counselling | |||||
| Mediation services | |||||
| Child assessment services | |||||
| Collaborative family law | |||||
| Programmes d'éducation parentale | |||||
| Parenting plans (written document jointly developed by parents) | |||||
| Psychological effects of divorce on children | |||||
| Domestic violence services | |||||
| Supervised Access | |||||
| Supervised Exchange | |||||
| Child Support Issues | |||||
| Family Law Information Centres | |||||
| Maintenance enforcement programs | |||||
| Financial assistance services | |||||
| Legal Aid services/Duty counsel | |||||
| Spousal support issues | |||||
| Variation or recalculation services |
3.3 Where do your clients get their information about the above? (Please check all that apply.)

3.4 How often do you inform your clients about or refer your clients to the following?
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriage or relationship counselling | ||||
| Individual Conselling | ||||
| Mediation services | ||||
| Child assessment services | ||||
| Collaborative family lawe | ||||
| Parenting plans | ||||
| Parenting education programs | ||||
| Domestic violence services | ||||
| Supervised access | ||||
| Supervised exchange | ||||
| Maintenance enforcement programs | ||||
| Financial assistance services | ||||
| Legal Aid services/Duty counsel | ||||
| Variation or recalculation services |
3.5 How willing are your clients to use family justice services?
For clients who are willing to use family justice services, did they experience any difficulties in accessing them?
If yes, what was the major difficulty?

For clients who are not willing to access family justice services, what is the biggest obstacle?

3.6 To what extent do you think that your cases are more likely to be settled out of court because of the family justice services that are available?
3.7 Are there services that are not available in your community that you think would be
helpful for you and your clients? If so, please specify.


3.8 Are family justice services available to your clients in their official language of choice?
3.9 Is there a Unified Family Court in your province/territory?
3.10 To what extent do you agree that Unified Family Courts accomplish the following?
| Strongly agree | Agree | Disagree | Strongly Agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simplify procedures | ||||
| Provide easy access to various family justice services | ||||
| Provide timely resolution to family law matters | ||||
| Produce outcomes tailored to individual needs |
3.11 If your province/territory does not currently have Unified Family Courts, would you like to see them implemented?
Please explain. 
4.0 Best Interest Criteria
Currently, subsection 16(8) of the Divorce Act provides that in making a custody order, the court shall take into consideration only the best interests of the child of the marriage as determined by reference to the condition, means, needs, and other circumstances of the child.
4.1 Does the provincial/territorial legislation in your jurisdiction include specific criteria for determining the best interests of the child?
If yes, do you use these criteria in cases under the Divorce Act?

4.2 In your experience, are most parenting arrangements that are made through the following processes consistent with the best interests of the child?
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| Arrangements made by parents themselves | ||
| Arrangements made as a result of mediation | ||
| Arrangements negotiated by lawyers (on their own or after judicial conference) | ||
| Arrangements that are a result of collaborative family law | ||
| Arrangements made by a judge after a trial of hearing |
4.3 In your experience, when parents are aware of the negative effects of separation/divorce on their children, does this awareness affect their behaviour?
Please explain.
4.4 In your opinion, are parenting plans (i.e., a detailed written plan jointly developed by parents to address their child's care and needs) a good mechanism for ensuring that the best interests of the child are met?
4.5 In what proportion of your cases with children involved are parenting plans used?
% [Judges: Please go to Question 5.1]
4.6 Do you have a form that you use as a guide for parenting plans?
If no, do you think a guide would be useful?
4.7 In your experience, how helpful are parenting plans to your clients?
Please explain 
5.0 Child Representation
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child asserts the right of the child to participate in decisions that affect his or her life.
5.1 What are the best mechanisms to enable children to voice their views? (Please check all that apply.)

5.2 Which of the following factors are important when deciding what weight should be given to the child's views? (Please check all that apply.)

5.3 How much weight should be given to the preferences of a child regarding custody decisions at the following ages?
| None | Light | Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 6 years of age | |||
| 6 to 9 years of age | |||
| 10 to 13 years of age | |||
| 14 years or older |
6.1 How often do you use terminology other than "custody"
and "
access "
in your agreements?
6.2 How often do you use terminology other than "custody"
and "
access "
in your orders?
6.3 In your experience, how often are parents sharing decision-making in the following areas?
| Rarely | Occassionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health | ||||
| Education | ||||
| Religion | ||||
| Cultural | ||||
| Child's residence | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
6.4 If legislative amendments to the Divorce Act replace the terms " custody " and "access" with "parenting order," which includes decision-making responsibilities and parenting time, to what extent do you think this would promote a less adversarial process?
6.5 When parents do not comply with their custody/access orders, what are the circumstances of the case? Please indicate how often this has occurred in your experience.
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access parent does not exercise access | ||||
| Access parent is late returning child | ||||
| Custodial parent refuses access for no valid cause | ||||
| Custodial parent refuses access for cause (e.g., access parent intoxicated) | ||||
| Child refuses visit with access parent | ||||
| Frequent changes in schedule | ||||
| Family violence concerns | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
[ Judges: Please go to Question 6.10 ]
6.6 What proportion of your cases with children involved include supervised access?
%
6.7 Under what circumstances do you recommend supervised access to your clients? (Please check all that apply.)
6.8 What proportion of your cases with children involved include supervised exchange?
%
6.9 Under what circumstances do you recommend supervised exchange to your clients? (Please check all that apply.)
%
6.11 In cases where parental relocation is an issue, how often are the following reasons given?
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment opportunity | ||||
| Educational opportunity | ||||
| To be closer to family/friends | ||||
| To be with new partner | ||||
| No particular reason | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
6.12 In cases where parental relocation is an issue, what are the circumstances? (Please indicate how often each of the following occurs in your experience.)
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custodial parent wishes to move within city | ||||
| Custodial parent wishes to move within the province/territory | ||||
| Custodial parent wishes to move to a different province/territory | ||||
| Custodial parent wishes to move outside the country | ||||
| Access parent wishes to move within the city | ||||
| Access parent wishes to move within the province/territory | ||||
| Access parent wishes to move to a different province/territory | ||||
| Access parent wishes to move outside the country | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
7.1 Overall, the Child Support Guidelines have resulted in a better system of determining child support than the pre-1997 system.
Please express your opinion regarding the following statements.
7.2 Cases are settled more quickly since the implementation of the Guidelines.
7.3 Since implementation of the Guidelines, most cases are resolved simply by relying on the Tables to establish amounts of support.
7.4 In cases involving litigation, the issues to be resolved are more defined and focussed than prior to implementation of the Guidelines.
7.5 What proportion of your child support cases involve undue hardship applications?
%
7.6 How often is income disclosure a problem in your experience?
If income disclosure is a problem, please explain.

7.7 How often are second families an issue in your experience?
If second families are an issue, please explain.

7.8 Are there areas of the Child Support Guidelines that you have found to be problematic in your experience? If so, please explain and suggest reforms.

8.1 In your experience, in what percent of cases is spousal support an issue?
%
8.2 The spousal support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG) were released in January 2005. In cases where spousal support is an issue, how often do you use the SSAG?
8.3 Have the SSAG made the handling of spousal support applications:
| more consistent | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| fairer | Yes | No |
| less conflictual | Yes | No |
| generally easier to resolve | Yes | No |
8.4 In your experience, when spousal support is an issue, in what percent of the following situations is:
| Reference made to SSAG | Resolution within the SSAG range | |
|---|---|---|
| Discussions with clients | ||
| Cases settled by negotiation | ||
| Cases settled by mediation | ||
| Interim motions | ||
| Cases settled by case conference | ||
| Cases resolved by judge after hearing |
8.5 In cases where spousal support is an issue, what are the circumstances of the case? (Based on your experience, how often do each of these occur?)
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claimant spouse is a stay-at-home parent | ||||
| Claimant spouse was a stay-at-home parent to children now grown and is not in labour force | ||||
| Couple had no children and claimant spouse is not in labour force | ||||
| Respondent's income is considerably higher than claimant spouse's income | ||||
| LPotential payor has income of $75,000 or more | ||||
| Trade-off of property in lieu of monetary spousal support | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
8.7 In cases where both child support and spousal support are issues, which matter is typically dealt with first in most cases.
[ Judges: Please go to Question 9.4 ]
9.0 Family Violence
9.1 Do you make inquiries in every case to attempt to identify cases of family violence?
9.2 Do you use a screening tool (i.e., a standardized questionnaire) to identify cases of family violence?
If yes, which one(s)? 
If yes, do you use the screening tool with both women and men?
9.3 Are you familiar with the services available for your clients in cases where there is family violence?
9.4 In cases involving spousal violence, how did the court address the issue? (Please indicate how often this has occurred in your experience.)
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment services were used | ||||
| Child was given legal representation | ||||
| Access supervision was ordered | ||||
| Exchange supervision was ordered | ||||
| Counselling services were used | ||||
| Parents were educated on the effects of family violence on children | ||||
| Access was denied to abusive parent | ||||
| Custody was denied to abusive parent | ||||
| Civil order restraining harassment/spousal contact | ||||
| Court did not address the issue | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
9.5 In these cases involving child abuse, how did the court address the issue? (Please indicate how often this has occurred in your experience.)
| Rarely | Occasionally | Often | Almost Always | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment services were used | ||||
| Child was given legal representation | ||||
| Access supervision was ordered | ||||
| Exchange supervision was ordered | ||||
| Counselling services were used | ||||
| Parents were educated on the effects of family violence on children | ||||
| Access was denied to abusive parent | ||||
| Custody was denied to abusive parent | ||||
| Civil order restraining harassment/spousal contact | ||||
| Court did not address the issue | ||||
| Other (please specify) | ||||
9.6 Are training sessions on spousal violence issues available to family justice professionals in your jurisdiction?
If yes, is the available training adequate?
If yes, is the available training adequate?
9.7 Are training sessions on child abuse issues available to family justice professionals in your jurisdiction?
If yes, is the available training adequate?
9.8 Do you have any other comments about the family law system in Canada?

9.9 What topics would you like to see researched in the family law area in Canada?

Thank you for completing this survey.
