Table of contents
- Minister’s Message
- Acknowledgements
- Key Findings
- 1. Introduction
- 2. SOCJS Youth-Adapted Framework
- 3. Results by Expected Outcome
- 3.1 Expected outcome 1: Safe communities
- 3.2 Expected outcome 2: Fair and accessible
- 3.3 Expected outcome 3: Confidence in the system
- 3.4 Expected outcome 4: Operation of the youth criminal justice system
- 3.5 Expected outcome 5: Resolution mechanisms
- 3.6 Expected outcome 6: Correctional supervision
- 3.7 Expected outcome 7: Victims and survivors
- 3.8 Expected outcome 8: Indigenous youth
- 3.9 Expected outcome 9: Black youth
- 4. Discussion
- 4.1 How have police reported youth crime rates evolved in Canada?
- 4.2 How is the youth CJS performing with respect to its fairness, accessibility, and efficiency?
- 4.3 How is the youth CJS performing with the respect to its use of resolution mechanisms and non-custodial processes?
- 4.4 How does the performance of the CJS differ between female and male youth victims, survivors, accused, and offenders?
- 4.5 How is the CJS performing in reducing the overrepresentation of Indigenous youth in the system?
- 4.6 How is the CJS performing in reducing the overrepresentation of Black youth in the system?
- 5. Conclusion
- 6. Bibliography
- Annex I – Abbreviations
- Annex II – Definitions
- Annex III – Historical Trends
- Annex IV – SOCJS Framework
- Annex V – SOCJS Youth-Adapted Framework Indicator Tally
- Date modified: