The Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process: A Literature Review - 1989 to 1999
2. History and Theory (cont'd)
2. History and Theory (cont'd)
Bibliographical Materials
Pre-1990
- Aynes, R. (1984). Constitutional considerations: government responsibility and the right not to be a victim. Pepperdine L. Rev., 11, 63.
- Barfknecht, D. (1985). Concerns of Canada’s victims rights movement. Can. Community L. J., 8, 83. Cardenas, J. (1986). The crime victim in the prosecutorial process. Harv. J. of Law and Public Policy, 9, 357.
- Carrington, F., & Nicholson, G. (1989). Victims’ rights: An idea whose time has come — Five years later: The maturing of an idea. Pepperdine L. Rev., 17, 1.
- Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British J. of Criminology, 1, 1. Clarke, P. (1986). Is there a place for the victim in the prosecution process? Canadian Criminology Forum, 8, 31.
- Davis, P. (1989). The crime victim’s right to a criminal prosecution: a proposed model stature for the governance of private criminal prosecutions. De Paul L. Rev., 38, 329.
- Davis, R., Kunreuther, F., & Connick, E. (1984). Expanding the victim’s role in the criminal court dispositional process: The results of an experiment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 491.
- Elias, R. (1986). The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology, and Human Rights. New York City: Oxford University Press. Fattah, E. (Ed.). (1986). From Crime Policy To Victim Policy. New York City: St. Martin’s Press.
- Fattah, E. (Ed.) (1989a). The Plight of Crime Victims in Modern Society. New York City: St. Martin’s Press.
- Fattah, E. (1989b). Victims and victimology: The facts and the rhetoric. Int’l Review of Victimology, 1, 43.
- Federal-Provincial Task Force on Justice for Victims of Crime. (1983). Justice for Victims of Crime Report. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
- Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (1981). Perspectives On Crime Victims. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company.
- Gittler, J. (1984). Expanding the role of the victim in criminal prosecution. Pepperdine L. Rev., 11, 117.
- Grabosky, P.N. (1987). "Victims" in Zdenkowski. The Criminal Injustice System. Sydney: Pluto Press.
- Hagan, J. (1983). Victims Before the Law: The Organizational Dominion of Criminal Law. Toronto: Butterworths.
- Hellerstein, D. (1989). The victim impact statement: Reform or reprisal? Am. Crim. L. Rev., 27, 391.
- Henderson, L. (1985). The wrong of victims’ rights. Stanford L. R., 37, 937.
- Kelly, D.P. (1987). Victims. Wayne L. R., 34, 69. Kennard, K. (1989). The victim’s veto: A way to increase victim impact on criminal case dispositions. Calif. L. Rev., 77, 417.
- Kilpatrick, D., & Otto, R. (1987). Constitutionally guaranteed participation in criminal proceedings for victims: Potential effects on psychological functioning. Wayne L. Rev., 34, 7.
- Langbein, J. (1978). The criminal trial before the lawyers. U of Chicago L. R., 45, 263.
- Marshall, T.F. (1985). Alternatives to Criminal Courts: The Potential for Non-Judicial Dispute Settlement. Aldershot: Gower.
- Mashaw, J.(1976). The Supreme Court’s due process calculus. U. of Chicago L. R., 44, 28.
- McDonald, W. (1976). Towards a bicentennial revolution in criminal justice: The return of the victim. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 13, 649.
- McLeod, M. (1986). Victim participation at sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin, 22, 501.
- Newman, G. (1985). The Punishment Response (2nd ed.). Albany: Harrow and Heston.
- Roberts, J., & Doob, A. (1989). Sentencing and public opinion: Taking false shadows for true substances. Osgoode Hall L. J., 27, 491.
- Rock, P. (1986). A View From the Shadows: The Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada and the Making of the Justice for Victims of Crime Initiative. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Roland, D. (1989). Progress in the victim reform movement: No longer the ‘forgotten victim’. Pepperdine L. Rev., 17, 35.
- Rubel, H. (1986). Victim participation in sentencing proceedings. Crim. L. Q., 28, 226.
- Schafer, S. (1977). Victimology: The Victim and His Criminal. Reston: Reston Publishing.
- Sumner, C.J. (1987). Victim participation in the criminal justice system. Australian and New Zealand J. of Criminology, 20, 195.
- Umbreit, M. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation, 53, 52.
- Umbreit, M. (1985). Crime and Reconciliation. Nashville: Abington Press.
- Waller, I. (1989). Justice even for the crime victim: Implementing international standards. Int’l Rev. of Victimology, 1, 89.
- Waller, I. (1985). Victim v. Regina v. Wrongdoer: Justice. Can. Com. L. J., 8, 1.
- Waller, I. (1988). The Role of the Victim in Sentencing and Related Processes. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, Research and Development Directorate, Policy, Programs and Research Branch.
- Welling, S. (1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington U. L. Q., 65, 301.
- Welling, S. (1988). Victims in the criminal process: A utilitarian analysis of victim participation in the charging decision. Arizona L. Rev., 30, 85.
- Wright, M., & Galaway, B. (Eds.). (1989). Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders, and Community. London: Sage.
- Victorian Sentencing Commission. (1988). Sentencing: Report of the Committee. Melbourne: Author.
- Ziegenhagen, Eduard A. (1977). Victims, Crime, and Social Control. New York: Praeger.
1990
- Erez, E. (1990). Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Crim. Justice, 18, 19.
- Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (Eds.). (1990). Criminal Justice, Restitution and Reconciliation. Monsey: Willow Tree Press.
- Polito, K. (1990). The rights of crime victims in the criminal justice system: Is justice blind to the victims of crime? New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 16, 241.
- Waller, I. (1990). Victims, safer communities and sentencing. Can. J. Crim., 32, 461.
- Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale: Herald Press.
1991
- Giliberti, C. (1991). Evaluation of victim impact statement projects in Canada: A summary of the findings. In G. Kaiser, H. Kury &
- J. Albrecht (Eds.), Victims and Criminal Justice. Freiburg: Max-Planck Institute. Hall, D. (1991). Victims’ voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 28, 233.
- Joutsen, M. (1991). Changing victim policy: International dimensions. In G. Kaiser, H. Kury & J. Albrecht (Eds.), Victims and Criminal Justice. Freiburg: Max-Planck Institute.
- Kaiser, G., Kury, H., & Albrecht, J. (Eds.). (1991). Victims and Criminal Justice: Legal Protection, Restitution, and Support. Freiburg: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht.
- Sykes, C. (1991). A Nation of Victims. New York: St. Martin’s.
- Waller, I. (1991). Report on the implementation of the basic principles embodied in the United Nations declaration on victims. Int’l Review of Victimology, 2, 65.
- Weitekamp. (1991). Recent developments on restitution and victim-offender reconciliation in the USA and Canada: An Assessment. In G. Kaiser, H. Kury & J. Albrecht (Eds.), Victims and Criminal Justice. Max-Planck Institute.
1992
- Abramovsky, A. (1992). Victim impact statements: Adversely impacting upon judicial fairness (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 21.
- Acker, J. (1992). Social sciences and the criminal law: Victims of crime — Plight vs. rights. Criminal Law Bulletin, 28, 64.
- Bendor, C. (1992). Defendants’ wrongs and victims’ rights. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties L. Rev., 27, 219.
- Cragg, W. (1992). The Practice of Punishment: Towards a Theory of Restorative Justice. London: Routledge.
- Davis, G. (1992). Making Amends: Mediation and Reparation in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge.
- Dignan, J. (1992). Repairing the damage: Can reparation be made to work in the service of diversion. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 453.
- Fattah, E. (1992). From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system. Can. J. Crim., 34, 110.
- Gegan, S., & Rodriguez, N. (1992). Victims’ roles in the criminal justice system: A fallacy of victim empowerment? (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 225.
- Gerwurz, D., & Mercurio, M. (1992). The victims’ Bill of Rights: Are victims all dressed up with no place to go? (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 251.
- Karmen, A. (1992). Who’s against victims’ rights? The nature of the opposition to pro-victim initiatives in criminal justice (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 157.
- Messmer, H., & Otto, H.U. (Eds.). (1992). Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation: International Perspectives. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Peerenboom, R.P. (1992). Victim harm, retributivism and capital punishment: A philosophical critique of Payne v. Tennessee. Pepperdine L. Rev., 20, 25.
- Roberts, J. (1992). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rowland, J. (1992). Illusions of justice: Who represents the victim? (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 177.
- Schneider, G. (1992). Victim impact statement: A victim’s steam valve. Crim. Justice J., 14, 407.
- Sperry, W. (1992). Victim impact evidence with a retributive system of justice. Creighton L. Rev., 25, 1275.
- Starkweather, D. (1992). The retributive theory of ‘just deserts’ and victim participation in plea bargaining. Indiana L. J., 67, 853.
- Viano, E. (Ed.). (1992). Critical Issues in Victimology: International Perspectives. New York: Springer.
- Date modified: