The Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process: A Literature Review - 1989 to 1999
4. Victims’ Rights Around the World (cont'd)
4. Victims’ Rights Around the World (cont'd)
Bibliographical Materials
American
Pre-1990
- Boudreaux, P. (1989). Booth v. Maryland and the individual vengeance rationale for criminal punishment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80, 177.
- Calcutt, P. (1988). The Victims’ Rights Act of 1988, the Florida constitution and the new struggle for victims’ rights. Florida State U.L. Rev., 16, 811.
- Campbell, P. (1980). Comparative study of victim compensation procedures in France and the United States: A modest proposal. Hastings Int’l and Comparative L. Rev., 3, 321.
- Davis, R., Kunreuther, F., & Connick, E. (1984). Expanding the victim’s role in the criminal court dispositional process: The results of an experiment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 491.
- Eikenberry, K. (1989). The elevation of victims’ rights in Washington State: Constitutional status. Pepperdine L. Rev., 17, 19.
- Hellerstein, D. (1989). The victim impact statement: Reform or reprisal? Am. Crim. L. Rev., 27, 391.
- Henderson, L. (1985). The wrongs of victims’ rights. Stanford L. Rev., 37, 937.
- Welling, S. (1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington U. L. Q., 65, 301.
- Welling, S. (1988). A victims in the criminal process: Utilitarian analysis of victim participation in the charging decision. Arizona L. Rev., 30, 85.
1990
- Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1990). Effect of victim participation on sentence outcome. Criminology, 28, 451.
- Roberts, A. (1990). Helping Crime Victims: Research, Policy, and Practice. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
- Young, M. (1990). Victim assistance in the United States: The end of the beginning. Int’l Rev. Victimology, 1, 181.
1991
- Hall, D. (1991). Victims’ voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 28, 233.
- Dixon, T. (1991). Arizona criminal procedure after the Victims’ Bill of Rights amendment: Implications of a victim’s absolute right to refuse a defendant’s discovery request. Arizona State L.J., 23, 831.
1992
- Bendor, C. (1992). Defendants’ wrongs and victims’ rights (case note) Payne v. Tennessee (111 S. Ct. 2597). Harv. Civil Rights-Civil Liberties L. Rev., 27, 219.
- Clarke, C., & Block, T. (1992). Victims’ voices and constitutional quandaries: Life after Payne v. Tennessee. St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 35.
- Ewing, C. (1992). The demise of Booth v. Maryland (case note) Payne v. Tennessee (111 S. Ct. 2597). Pacific L.J., 23, 1389.
- Fahey, P. (1992). An eye for an eye and then some (constitutionality of victim impact testimony) Payne v. Tennessee. Connecticut L. Rev., 25, 205.
- Ford, M., & Nembach, P. (1992). The victim’s right to privacy: Imperfect protection from the criminal justice system (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 205.
- Franck, L. (1992). The collection of restitution: An often overlooked service to crime victims. St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 107.
- Gegan, S., & Rodriguez, N. (1992). Victims’ roles in the criminal justice system: A fallacy of victim empowerment? (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 225.
- Gerwurz, D., & Mercurio, M. (1992). The victims’ Bill of Rights: Are victims all dressed up with no place to go? (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 251.
- Karmen, A. (1992). Who’s against victims’ rights? The nature of the opposition to pro-victim initiatives in criminal justice (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 157.
- Lauri, A., & Schaubeck, P. (1992). Like father like son? The constitutionality of New York’s Son of Sam law (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 279.
- Meske, M. (1992). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Crime victims’ dilemma (case note) Simon & Schuster v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board. Wash. L. Rev., 67, 1001.
- Nicholson, G. (1992). Victims rights, remedies and resources: A maturing presence in american jurisprudence (California) (Victims’ Rights Symposium). Pacific L.J., 23, 815.
- Smith, B., & Huff, C.R. (1992). From victim to political activist: An empirical examination of a state-wide victims’ rights movement. J. Crim. Just., 20, 201.
- Sperry, W. (1992). Victim impact evidence with a retributive system of justice. Creighton L. Rev., 25, 1275.
- Starkweather, D. (1992). The retributive theory of ‘just deserts’ and victim participation in plea bargaining. Indiana L.J., 67, 853.
- Tschorn, A. (1992). Beyond Son of Sam: A constitutionally valid alternative to New York executive law section 632-a. (case note) Simon and Schuster Inc. v. New York State Crime Victims Board (112 S. Ct. 501). Vermont L. Rev., 17, 321.
- Uelmen, G. (1992). Victims’ rights in California (Victims’ Rights Symposium). St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 8, 197.
1993
- Cornille, S. (1993). Retribution’s ‘harm component’ and the victim impact statement: Finding a workable model. U. of Dayton L.R., 389.
- Erlemeier, M. (1993). The First Amendment prevails over crime victim compensation (case note) Simon & Schuster Inc. v. New York State Crime Victims Board. Creighton L. Rev., 26, 1301.
- Loverdi, R. (1993). Victim impact evidence — Eighth Amendment does not erect a per se bar to the introduction of victim impact evidence at a capital sentencing hearing (Payne v. Tennessee). Rutgers L. J., 24, 543.
- McCoy, C. (1993). Politics and Plea Bargaining: Victims’ Rights in California. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- McLeod, E. (1993). Re-examining the admissibility of victim impact evidence. Mercer L. Rev., 44, 1461.
- Umbreit, M., & Coates, R. (1993). Cross-site analysis of victim-offender mediation in four states. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 565.
- Wegryn, R. (1993). New Jersey constitutional amendment for victims’ rights: Symbolic victory? Rutgers L.J., 25, 183.
1994
- Bernat, F., Parsonage, W., & Helfgott, J. (1994). Victim impact laws and the parole process in the United States. Int’l Rev. Victimology, 3, 121.
- Brown, J. (1994). Politics and plea bargaining: Victims’ rights in California. Hastings L.J., 45, 697.
- Cassell, P. (1994). Balancing the scales of justice: The case for and the effects of Utah’s victims’ rights amendment. Utah L. Rev., 1373.
- Davis R.C., & Smith, B. (1994). The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11, 453.
- Davis, R., & Smith, B. (1994). Victim impact statements and victim satisfaction: An unfulfilled promise? J. Crim. Justice, 22, 1.
- Ginsburg, W. (1994). Victims’ Rights: A Complete Guide to Crime Victim Compensation. Clearwater: Sphinx.
- Greer, D. (1994). Transatlantic perspective on the compensation of crime victims in the United States. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 333.
- Henley, M., Davis, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The reactions of prosecutors and judges to victim impact statements. Int’l Rev. Victimology, 3, 63.
- Kersh, M. (1994). The empowerment of the crime victim: A comparative study of victim compensation schemes in the United States and Australia. Calif. W. Int’l L.J., 24, 345.
- Palmer, J. (1994). Everything You Need to Know When You are a Victim of Violent Crime. New York: Rosen Publishing.
- Scott, S. (1994). Beyond the victims’ bill of rights: The shield becomes a sword. Arizona L. Rev., 36, 249.
- Sebba, L. (1994). Sentencing and the victim: The aftermath of Payne. Int’l Rev. Victimology, 3, 141.
- Umbreit, M. (1994). Crime victims confront their offenders: The impact of a Minneapolis mediation program. Research on Social Work Practice, 4, 436.
- Vital, V. (1994). The use of victim impact evidence at capital sentencing trials. Thurgood Marshall L. Rev., 19, 497.
1995
- Fletcher, G. (1995). With Justice for Some: Victims’ Rights in Criminal Trials. Reading: Addison-Wellesley.
- Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1995). Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death. Am. J. Criminal Justice, 20, 1.
- Mosteller, R. (1995). With justice for some: Victims’ rights in criminal trials. Harv. L. Rev., 109, 487.
- Mulholland, C. (1995). Sentencing criminals: The constitutionality of victim impact statements. Missouri L.R., 60, 731.
- Schulhofer, S. (1995). With justice for some: Victims’ rights in criminal trials. Yale L. J., 105, 825.
- Weed, F. (1995). Certainty of Justice: Reform in the Crime Movement. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
1996
- Dugger, A. (1996). Victim impact evidence in capital sentencing: A history of incompatibility. Am. J. Crim. L., 23, 375.
- Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (Eds.). (1996). Restorative Justice: International Perspectives. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
- Niemeyer, M., & Shichor, D. (1996). Preliminary study of a large victim/offender reconciliation program (Orange County, California). Federal Probation, 60, 30.
- Pizzi, W., & Perron, W. (1996). Crime victims in German courtrooms: A comparative perspective on American problems. Stanf. J. Int’l L., 32, 37.
- Spears, J., & Spohn, C. (1996). The genuine victim and prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Am. J. Crim. Justice, 20, 183.
- Subar, I. (1996). Emphasizing victims’ rights at the sentencing phase of criminal proceedings. Maryland L. Rev., 55, 72.
- Date modified: