Youth Court Judges' Views of the Youth Justice system: The results of a survey
Help in the sentencing process
A fair amount of variation existed regarding whether judges indicated that they could get a mental health assessment carried out in a timely fashion. [34] This did not appear to relate to the region of the country or whether the judge heard cases in relatively large centres (population of 100, 000 or more) or not.
| Frequency | Valid percent | Cumulative percent |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valid | All, almost all | 48 | 20.6 | 20.6 |
| Most | 79 | 33.9 | 54.5 | |
| About half | 38 | 16.3 | 70.8 | |
| Few, almost none, none |
63 | 27 | 97.9 | |
| Never seen need | 5 | 2.1 | 100 | |
| Total | 233 | 100 | ||
| Missing | 5 | |||
| Total | 238 | |||
Courts of appeal in all jurisdictions did not, overall, appear to be seen in a favourable light by most judges in terms of the helpfulness of their decisions for the judge when deciding particular sentences. [35]
| How helpful Court of Appeal in sentencing | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very helpful | Somewhat helpful | Rarely or never helpful | ||||
| Province or Territory | NF. | Count
Row percent |
2 50 % |
2 50 % |
4 100 % |
|
| PE | Count
Row percent |
1 100 % |
1 100 % |
|||
| NS. | Count
Row percent |
1 6.3 % |
9 56.3 % |
6 37.5 % |
16 100 % |
|
| NB | Count
Row percent |
1 11.1 % |
5 55.6 % |
3 33.3 % |
9 100 % |
|
| QC | Count
Row percent |
3 12.5 % |
16 66.7 % |
5 20.8 % |
24 100 % |
|
| ON | Count
Row percent |
5 7.5 % |
29 43.3 % |
33 49.3 % |
67 100 % |
|
| MN | Count
Row percent |
2 11.8 % |
5 29.4 % |
10 58.8 % |
17 100 % |
|
| SK | Count
Row percent |
8 50 % |
8 50 % |
16 100 % |
||
| AB | Count
Row percent |
1 4.8 % |
7 33.3 % |
13 61.9 % |
21 100 % |
|
| BC | Count
Row percent |
2 3.8 % |
19 35.8 % |
32 60.4 % |
53 100 % |
|
| YK | Count
Row percent |
1 100 % |
1 100 % |
|||
| NW | Count
Row percent |
3 100 % |
3 100 % |
|||
| Total | Count
Row percent |
15 6.5 % |
101 43.5 % |
116 50 % |
232 100 % |
|
However, Quebec judges appeared to be more likely than judges in the rest of Canada to indicate that their Court of Appeal was valuable to them. [36]
| How helpful Court of Appeal in sentencing | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very helpful | Somewhat helpful | Rarely or never helpful | ||||
| Quebec compared to Rest of Canada | Quebec | Count
Row percent |
3 12.5 % |
16 66.7 % |
5 20.8 % |
24 100 % |
| Rest of Canada | Count
Row percent |
12 5.8 % |
85 40.9 % |
111 53.4 % |
208 100 % |
|
| Total | Count
Row percent |
15 6.5 % |
101 43.5 % |
116 50 % |
232 100 % |
|
Chi-square = 9.35, df=2, p<.01 (1 low expected value=1.55),
Pooling very and somewhat helpful, Chi-square = 7.85, df=1, p<.05.
- Date modified: