Evaluation of the Youth Justice Initiative Funding Components
APPENDIX H:
File Review Templates
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
Youth Justice Services Funding Program
File Review Template
Jurisdiction:
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
Documents reviewed
- ±1 YJSFP Annual Plans
- ±2 YJSFP Annual Reports
- ±6 Other:
Please cite source document(s) used to answer each question.
| Amount of funding / Agreement type | Fiscal year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005/06 | 2006/07 | 2007/08 | 2008/09 | |
| Type of agreement | ||||
| Minimum provincial expenditure on high priority programming ($) | ||||
| High priority ($) | ||||
| Medium priority ($) | ||||
| Low priority ($) | ||||
| Annual budget ($) | ||||
| Federal contribution | ||||
SECTION 1.0
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
To be completed off-site
Off-site documents reviewed:
- ±1 IRCS Agreements
- ±3 Summary Tables of Jurisdictional Expenditures
- ±2 Annual Reports
- ±4 Provincial IRCS program manual (if applicable)
Please cite source document(s) used to answer each question.
1.1 How is the basic capacity funding (Part A) used by jurisdictions?
Part A: Basic capacity (see Summary Table of Jurisdictional Expenditures for Fiscal Year)
| Program or Service | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|
| Development of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Maintenance of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Development of capacity to prepare treatment plans | |
| Enhancement of ongoing assessment capacity and the provision of rehabilitative services for similar non-IRCS cases |
| Program or Service | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|
| Development of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Maintenance of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Development of capacity to prepare treatment plans | |
| Enhancement of ongoing assessment capacity and the provision of rehabilitative services for similar non-IRCS cases |
| Program or Service | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|
| Development of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Maintenance of capacity to provide pre-sentence assessments | |
| Development of capacity to prepare treatment plans | |
| Enhancement of ongoing assessment capacity and the provision of rehabilitative services for similar non-IRCS cases |
| Program or Service | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|
| Capacity for assessments, treatment plan development, and specialized rehabilitative services for seriously violent youth with mental health issues as per the previous agreements ($100K) | |
| Capacity enhancements beyond that of fiscal year 2007-2008 (incremental $100K) |
Please describe use of Part A incremental funding (2008-2009)
($100K in provinces, $50K in YT and NT, $25K in NU):
Other notes on Part A: Basic capacity programs and services:
1.2 How is the case funding (Part B) used by jurisdictions?
Part B: Case funding (see Summary Table of Jurisdictional Expenditures for Fiscal Year)
| Custody | Actual Expenditures | Community | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports and assessments | Reports and assessments | ||
| Rehabilitative services | Rehabilitative services | ||
| Basic custodial programming | Reintegration services | ||
| Reintegration services | Independent residential and living allowance | ||
| Conferences | Travel and living expenses | ||
| Other: |
Escort staff | ||
| Community support and supervision | |||
| Attendance programs | |||
| Conferences | |||
| Other: |
|||
| Subtotal in custody (a) | Subtotal in community (a1) | ||
| Total in custody and community (a+a1): | Total number eligible days in: Custody: |
||
| Custody | Actual Expenditures | Community | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports and assessments | Reports and assessments | ||
| Rehabilitative services | Rehabilitative services | ||
| Basic custodial programming | Reintegration services | ||
| Reintegration services | Independent residential and living allowance | ||
| Conferences | Travel and living expenses | ||
| Other: |
Escort staff | ||
| Community support and supervision | |||
| Attendance programs | |||
| Conferences | |||
| Other: |
|||
| Subtotal in custody (a) | Subtotal in community (a1) | ||
| Total in custody and community (a+a1): | Total number eligible days in: Custody: |
||
| Custody | Actual Expenditures | Community | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports and assessments | Reports and assessments | ||
| Rehabilitative services | Rehabilitative services | ||
| Basic custodial programming | Reintegration services | ||
| Reintegration services | Independent residential and living allowance | ||
| Conferences | Travel and living expenses | ||
| Other: |
Escort staff | ||
| Community support and supervision | |||
| Attendance programs | |||
| Conferences | |||
| Other: |
|||
| Subtotal in custody (a) | Subtotal in community (a1) | ||
| Total in custody and community (a+a1): | Total number eligible days in: Custody: |
||
| Custody | Actual Expenditures | Community | Actual Expenditures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports and assessments | Reports and assessments | ||
| Rehabilitative services | Rehabilitative services | ||
| Basic custodial programming | Reintegration services | ||
| Reintegration services | Independent residential and living allowance | ||
| Conferences | Travel and living expenses | ||
| Other: |
Escort staff | ||
| Community support and supervision | |||
| Attendance programs | |||
| Conferences | |||
| Other: |
|||
| Subtotal in custody (a) | Subtotal in community (a1) | ||
| Total in custody and community (a+a1): | Total number eligible days in: Custody: |
||
Description of types of programming and services provided under Part B:
Other notes on IRCS Part B: Case funding programs and services:
1.3 In what manner and to what extent have the activities and outputs contributed toward achieving the objectives and intended outcomes of the YJI funding components?
- Increased capacity to offer specialized services for serious violent young offenders suffering from a mental illness or disorder
- Increased access to specialized services for serious violent young offenders suffering from a mental illness or disorder
- Enhanced opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration of youth
- Accountability measures reflect severity of offence and degree of responsibility of the offender
- More integrated, coordinated approach to youth justice
- Fairer, more effective youth justice system
Notes on achievement of outcomes: (Use examples if possible)
SECTION 2.0
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
To be completed on-site for each IRCS case
On-site documents reviewed:
- ±1 Notification of IRCS Order and/or Modification Thereof Face Sheet
for IRCS sentences imposed during FY 2005-2006 to 2008-2009
Date of Submission: Federal Identifier:
Current Charge:
Nature of Offence:
- ±1 Presumptive
- ±2 3rd Serious Violent Offence (SVO)
In the case of a presumptive offence, did the Crown waive the presumption?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Not applicable (3rd Serious Violent Offence)
In the case of a third Serious Violent Offence, did the Crown seek an adult penalty?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Not applicable (presumptive offence)
Prior Convictions:
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
E.g.,
Reasons for Sentence:
Start Date of IRCS Sentence:
Total Length of Sentence:
Custody Portion:
Community Portion:
Gender of Young Person:
- ±1 Male
- ±2 Female
- Age of Young Person:
years
Aboriginal Status:
- ±1 Aboriginal
- ±0 Not Aboriginal
- ±8 Can’t determine
Young person’s diagnosis:
Transfer of young person?
- ±1 Yes – To which jurisdiction?
- ±0 No
Is the transfer for the purposes of accessing treatment?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
Other Information/Additional Comments:
SECTION 3.0
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
To be completed on- and off-site
Off-site documents reviewed:
- ±1 IRCS Agreements
- ±2 Annual Reports
- ±3 Summary Tables of Jurisdictional Expenditures
On-site documents reviewed:
- ±4 Notification of IRCS Order and/or Modification Thereof Face Sheet – for IRCS sentences imposed during FY 2005-2006 to 2008-2009 – Dates of submission only
- ±5 Correspondence
- ±6 Any additional documentation not identified in Section 1.0 or Section 2.0
Please cite source document(s) used to answer each question.
To what extent has the Department of Justice implemented an effective performance
measurement strategy to:
- provide timely management information
- assist the Department of Justice in ongoing performance monitoring and program adjustment
- capture adequate and useful information for assessing the impact of YJI funding?
Is there evidence in the file that the agreement is being monitored?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Can’t determine
Please describe:
Is there any performance measurement data in the file?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Can’t determine
Please describe:
Does the file indicate any difficulties in reporting?
- ±00 No difficulties
- ±01 Late reports
- ±02 Inconsistent information
- ±03 Missing reports
- ±04 Failure to fulfil reporting requirements (substantively lacking).
Please describe: - ±66 Other (describe):
- ±88 Can't determine
Were Court Orders and Face Sheets submitted within 30 days of IRCS sentence for each IRCS case?
- ±4 Always
- ±3 Usually
- ±2 Sometimes
- ±1 Rarely
- ±0 Never
- ±8 Can’t determine
Notes: (e.g., missing reports, extent of delay in reporting)
SECTION 4.0
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
To be completed on- and off-site
Off-site documents reviewed:
- ±1 IRCS Agreements
- ±2 Annual Reports
- ±3 Summary Tables of Jurisdictional Expenditures
On-site documents reviewed:
- ±4 Correspondence
- ±5 Any additional documentation not covered in previous sections
Please cite source document(s) used to answer each question.
4.1 What unintended or unanticipated impacts were generated by the YJI funding components? How have they impacted achievement of the intended outcomes?
Does the file contain evidence of unintended impacts of IRCS?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Can’t determine
Describe unintended impacts, and indicate if each impact is positive, negative,
or neutral:
4.2 What factors are contributing to or constraining the achievement of the objectives and intended outcomes?
- Describe any challenges:
- How are these challenges constraining success?
- Describe any best practices/factors contributing to success:
- How are these best practices contributing to success?
4.3 If the program or activity continues, how could its efficiency be improved?
Does the file indicate any inefficiencies?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Can’t determine
Describe:
Have any possible efficiencies been identified in the file? ±1 Yes ±0
No ±8 Can’t determine
Describe:
If yes, were suggested efficiencies put into practice?
- ±1 Yes
- ±0 No
- ±8 Can’t determine
Describe:
Overview
Reviewer initials:
Date of review:
Evaluation of the Youth Justice Initiative Funding Components Youth Justice Fund
File Review Template
Overview
Department of Justice Assistance
Performance measurement and results
Documents reviewed:
- □ Youth Justice Fund Letter of Intent
- □ Project proposal
- □ Youth Justice Fund Application Letter
- □ Face sheet/Grants and Contributions Approval Document
- □ Project Funding Agreement
- □ Project budget and financial documents
- □ Youth Justice Fund Project Activity Report
- □ Youth Justice Fund Project Progress Report
- □ Youth Justice Fund Interim Report
- □ Youth Justice Fund Youth Referral Summary
- □ Youth Justice Fund Final Report
- □ Youth Justice Fund Final Project Summary Report
- □ Deliverables (reports, manuals, communication materials, community activities)
- □ Evaluation report (if applicable)
- □ Other:
- Date modified: