L'efficacité des pratiques de la justice réparatrice : Méta-analyse
8. Bibliographie
* Désigne une étude utilisée dans la méta-analyse
- Andrews, D. A., I. Zinger, R. Hoge, J. Bonta, P. Gendreau et F. Cullen. « Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis ». Criminology, no 28, 1998, p. 369-404.
- Andrews, D. A. et J. Bonta. Psychology of Criminal Conduct (2e éd.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing. 1998.
- Barnett, R. (1977). « Restitution: A new paradigm of criminal justice ». Ethics, no 87,279-301.
- Bazemore, G. et L. Walgrave. Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. 1999.
- Bazemore, G. et M. F. Schiff. « Community Justice/Restorative Justice: Prospects for a new social ecology for community corrections ». International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, no 20, 1996, p. 311-335.
- Bonta, J., M. Law et R. K. Hanson. « The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis ». Psychological Bulletin, no 123, 1998, p. 123-142.
- *Bonta, J., S. Wallace-Capretta et J. Rooney. La justice réparatrice : évaluation du programme de solutions réparatrices. Ottawa (Ontario) : Solliciteur général du Canada. 1998.
- Braithwaite, J. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989.
- Braithwaite, J.
« Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts »
. In M. Tonry (éd.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, no 25, 1999, p. 1-127. - Commission du droit. De la justice réparatrice à la justice transformatrice : document de discussion. Ottawa (Ontario) : Commission du droit du Canada. 2000.
- Cooper, H., et R. Rosenthal. « Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarising research findings ». Psychological Bulletin, no 87, 1980, p. 442-449.
- Crowe, A. H. (1998). « Restorative justice and offender rehabilitation: A meeting of the minds ». Perspectives: Journal of the American Probation and Parole Association, no 22, 1998, p. 28-41.
- *Davis, R. C. « Mediation: The Brooklyn experiment ». Dans R. Tomasic et M. Feeley (éd.). Neighbourhood Justice: Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York, NY: Longman Inc. 1982.
- Dowden, C. (1998). A Meta-analytic Examination of the Risk, Need and Responsivity Principles and their Importance within the Rehabilitation Debate. Thèse de maîtrise inédite. Ottawa (Ontario) : Département de psychologie, Carleton University.
- Dowden, C. et D. A. Andrews. « What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review ». Crime and Delinquency, no 45, 1999, p. 438-452.
- Dowden, C. et D. A. Andrews. « Effective correctional treatment and violent re-offending: A meta-analysis ». Canadian Journal of Criminology/Revue canadienne de criminologie, no 42, 2000, p. 449-476.
- Dowden, C. et D. A. Andrews (à l'étude). The importance of staff characteristics in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. Manuscrit présenté pour publication.
- Dowden, C. et S. Brown (sous presse). « The role of substance abuse factors in predicting recidivism: A meta-analysis ». Psychology, Crime, and Law.
- Eglash, A. « Beyond restitution: Creative restitution ». Dans J. Hudson et B. Galaway (éd.), Restitution in Criminal Justice. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath. 1977.
- *Evje, A. et R. C. Cushman. A Summary of the Evaluations of Six California Victim Offender Reconciliation Programs. The Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts, Center for Families, Children & the Courts. 2000.
- *Fercello, C. et M. Umbreit. Client Evaluation of Family Group Conferencing in 12 Sites in 1st Judicial District of Minnesota. Center for Restorative Justice & Mediation, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota. 1998.
- Gendreau, P., T. Little et C. Goggin. « A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! ». Criminology, no 34, 1996, p. 575-607.
- Gendreau, P., C. Goggin et F. Cullen, F. The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism. Ottawa (Ontario) : Direction de la recherche correctionnelle, ministère du Solliciteur général du Canada. 1999.
- Glass, G., B. McGaw et M. Smith. Meta-analysis in Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1981.
- Groupe fédéral-provincial-territorial sur la justice réparatrice. La justice réparatrice au Canada : document de consultation. Ottawa (Ontario) : Ministère de la Justice, Canada. 2000.
- Hanson, R. K. et M. Bussière. « Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies ». Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, no 66, 1998, p. 348-362.
- Hawkins, J.D., T. Herrenkohl, D. P. Farrington, D. Brewser, R. F. Catalano et T. W. Harachi. A review of predictors of youth violence. Dans R. Loeber et D. P. Farrington (éd.), Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. London: Sage. 1998.
- Hooper, S. et R. Busch. « Domestic Violence and Restorative Justice Initiatives: The Risks of a New Panacea ». Waikato Law Review, no 4 : Special Issue on Domestic Violence. 1996.
- Hughes, P., et M. J. Mossman. Re-thinking Access to Criminal Justice in Canada: A Critical Review of Needs and Responses. Document inédit pour le ministère de la Justice du Canada. 2001.
- LaPrairie, C. « Altering course: New directions in criminal justice-Sentencing circles and family group conferences ». Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Special Issue: Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, 1995, p. 78-99.
- Latimer, J. et S. Kleinknecht. The Effects of Restorative Justice Programming: A Review of the Empirical Research Literature. Ottawa (Ontario) : Division de la recherche et de la statistique, ministère de la Justice, Canada. 2000.
- Latimer, J. (2001). « A meta-analytic examination of youth delinquency, family treatment and recidivism ». Canadian Journal of Criminology/Revue canadienne de criminologie, no 43, p. 237-253.
- Lipsey, M. et D. Wilson. « The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis ». American Psychologist, no 48, 1993. p. 1181-1209.
- Lipsey, M. (1995). « What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? » Dans J. McGuire (éd.), What Works: Reducing Reoffending - Guidelines from Research and Practice. Chichester, Angleterre: John Wiley & Sons.
- Lipsey, M. et J. Derzon. « Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research ». Dans R. Loeber et D.P. Farrington (éd.), Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. London: Sage. 1998.
- Llewellyn, J. et R. Howse. La justice réparatrice : cadre de réflexion. Ottawa (Ontario) : Commission du droit du Canada. 1998.
- Losel, F. (1995). « The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations ». Dans J. McGuire (éd.), What works: Reducing re-offending. Guidelines from research and practice. Chichester, Angleterre : John Wiley & Sons.
- Marshall, T. (1985). Alternatives to Criminal Courts: The Potential for Non-judicial Dispute Resolution. Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Co.
- Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative Justice: An Overview. London, Angleterre : Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
- *McCold, P., et J. Stahr. Bethlehem Police Family Group Conferencing Project. Document présenté à l’assemblée annuelle de l’American Society of Criminology, Chicago, du 20 au 23 novembre 1996.
- Date de modification :