Pre-Trial Detention Under the Young Offenders Act: A Study of Urban Courts
APPENDIX: METHOD AND SUPPORTING TABLES (cont'd)
TABLE A.16 -
B VALUES AND SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOCIAL, SOCIO-LEGAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COURT UNDERTAKING WITH AN AREA RESTRICTION, BY COURT LOCATION
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| % of cases where area restriction was a condition |
41% |
48% |
27% |
11% |
42% |
Non-legal (social) factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Being female |
-.45 |
-.17 |
-.13 |
-.08 |
09 |
| Age |
33 |
.16 |
- |
-.17 |
.08 |
| Race (black/Aboriginal) |
- |
-.02 |
.15 |
na |
.17 |
Socio-legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Living outside family setting |
.30 |
.29 ** |
-.16 |
- |
.04 |
Legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Having prior custody disposition |
- |
- |
-.19 |
- |
- |
| Having prior bail violations |
-.13 |
-.18 * |
- |
-.01 |
-.09 |
| Property charge at arrest |
-.01 |
-.23 * |
- |
- |
- |
| Shoplifting charge at arrest |
- |
- |
.42 |
.21 |
- |
| Current person |
- |
- |
- |
- |
.15 |
| Any car theft? |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-.30 * |
| Number of cases |
56 |
104 |
94 |
72 |
120 |
| Statistical significance of the anova |
n.s. |
** |
* |
n.s. |
* |
TABLE A.17 - B VALUES AND SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOCIAL, SOCIO-LEGAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COURT UNDERTAKING TO ATTEND SCHOOL (OR WORK), BY COURT LOCATION
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| % of cases where area restriction was a condition |
5% |
52% |
30% |
26% |
20% |
Non-legal (social) factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Being female |
-.07 |
.20 |
-.12 |
-.15 |
-.12 |
| Age |
08 |
-.02 |
17 |
-.35 * |
-.10 |
| Race (black/Aboriginal) |
-.01 |
.20 * |
-.09 |
na |
-.03 |
Socio-legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Living outside family setting |
-.03 |
.11 |
- |
- |
-.03 |
Legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Presence or number of prior convictions |
.01 |
-.21 * |
.08 |
.15 |
- |
| Having prior bail violations |
.25 *** |
- |
- |
- |
.16 |
| Property charge at arrest |
- |
.31 ** |
- |
.12 |
- |
| Administration of justice charge at arrest |
-.07 |
- |
- |
- |
.05 |
| Current charge is indictable |
- |
- |
.22 * |
- |
- |
| Number of cases |
54 |
103 |
93 |
61 |
121 |
| Statistical significance of the anova |
*** |
** |
n.s. |
* |
n.s. |
TABLE A.18 - B VALUES AND SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOCIAL, SOCIO-LEGAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COURT UNDERTAKING TO ABSTAIN FROM DRUGS AND ALCOHOL, BY COURT LOCATION
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| % of cases where abstain from drugs/alcohol was a condition |
31% |
25% |
29% |
22% |
11% |
Non-legal (social) factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Being female |
- |
-.18 |
.13 |
-.09 |
-.09 |
| Age |
.27 |
.19 |
.16 |
-.11 |
.05 |
| Race (black/Aboriginal) |
- |
-.06 |
-.07 |
na |
.03 |
Socio-legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Living outside family setting |
.33 * |
-.13 |
.12 |
- |
.02 |
| Alleged substance abuser |
.24 * |
.23 |
.29 ** |
.03 |
.06 |
Legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Having prior bail violations |
.13 |
.06 |
-.14 |
.06 |
.12 |
| Person charge at arrest |
- |
- |
- |
.17 |
- |
| Property charge at arrest |
- |
- |
-.06 |
- |
- |
| Administration of justice charge at arrest |
-.26 * |
- |
- |
- |
.04 |
| Current charge is "other" offence e.g. drinking & driving |
- |
.26 * |
- |
- |
- |
| Number of cases |
56 |
104 |
96 |
72 |
120 |
| Statistical significance of the anova |
*** |
* |
** |
n.s |
n.s |
Notes:
- *** p<.001, **p<.01, * p<.05. If the cell is blank, then the factor was not statistically associated with the condition. "-" means that the variable was not included in the model. "n.a." means the variable was excluded because of missing values.
- The first value in the cell is the unstandardized B coefficient.