3 Overview of the Contraventions Act Program

3.1 Program overview

The primary purpose of the Contraventions Act Program is to establish a prosecution regime that reflects the nature of regulatory offences (as opposed to criminal offences). This prosecution regime rests on two pillars: the Contraventions Act and the Contraventions Act Fund.

The Contraventions Act

The Contraventions Act (the Act) allows the federal government to designate federal regulatory offences as contraventions, which may be enforced by means of tickets, instead of being systematically prosecuted under the summary conviction process established in the Criminal Code. The objectives of the Act are:

The distinction between criminal and regulatory offences has practical consequences. While criminal offences are concerned with “seriously wrongful acts violating common standards of decency and humanity”, regulatory offences “are not necessarily wrong in themselves but (they are) prohibited for expediency”.Footnote 1 Most criminal offences are contained in a limited number of statutes, notably the Criminal Code. As for regulatory offences, they are contained in countless acts and regulations that are enacted at the municipal, provincial, and federal levels, and they cover a wide range of areas such as traffic and parking, licencing, the environment and habitat protection, recreational fishing and hunting, transport, dangerous goods, commercial and industrial activities, fisheries and agriculture, and public health, to name but a few of those areas.

All levels of government have implemented procedural frameworks to support the enforcement of these offences. Criminal offences are prosecuted through the summary conviction process, or by indictment in the case of more serious criminal offences. Regulatory offences are typically enforced using a ticketing system, or administrative monetary penalties (AMP), which are further discussed in section 4.1 of this report.

For an extended period, the federal government essentially relied on the summary conviction process to prosecute the regulatory offences for which its various departments and agencies were responsible and, as such, it stood in contrast to provincial and municipalities that were using a ticketing or an AMP regime. Having this summary conviction process as the sole option for all federal regulatory offences was seen as inefficient, which led to the adoption, in 1992, of the Contraventions Act.

The Contraventions Act includes two mechanisms for implementing a ticketing regime for federal contraventions:

Once these two steps are completed, enforcement officers can start issuing contraventions tickets, which will be directed to the applicable provincial ticketing system for enforcement purposes. Nothing compels a provincial government to sign an agreement under the Contraventions Act, making this option entirely dependent on the will of a provincial government to sign such an agreement.

Since the second option has been the only one available, all contravention tickets issued to date have been enforced using the existing ticketing system in provinces where the regime is operational. This includes all provinces except Saskatchewan and Alberta. In addition, the contraventions regime is not yet operational in the three territories and on other federal lands, such as First Nation reserves.

In the absence of the contraventions regime, federal offences designated as contraventions must be prosecuted under the Criminal Code summary conviction process.

The Contraventions Act Program

The Contraventions Act Program consists of a range of coordinated responsibilities undertaken by Justice Canada, which are necessary for the implementation and the administration of the contraventions regime. These responsibilities include the provision of legal services in matters related to ticketing procedures; the designation of federal offences as contraventions; the required amendments to applicable regulations; the negotiation of agreements; the determination of appropriate measures related to language rights; the management of the regime in provinces; and the management of the transfer payment program referred to as the Contraventions Act Fund. Justice Canada also manages the FPT working groups, which are responsible for the implementation and administration of the contraventions regime in provinces and municipalities, and the Justice Department Study Group, comprised of Legal Services Units counsel.

The Contraventions Act Fund supports the implementation of measures that aim to ensure that provincial or municipal governments have the capacity to deliver services related to federal contraventions in a manner consistent with applicable language rights found in the Criminal Code (judicial services) and the Official Languages Act (extrajudicial services). These measures include the hiring of bilingual court personnel, language training, bilingual signage and documentation, as well as the costs that provinces or municipalities incur to manage and report on these funded activities.

3.2 Governance structure

Two groups within the Policy Sector’s Programs Branch at Justice Canada contribute to the ongoing management of the Contraventions Act Program.

3.3 Resources

Table 3 includes the allocated resources associated with the Contraventions Act Program during the period covered by this evaluation. The majority of resources are allocated to contributions provided to participating provinces and municipalities for bilingual service delivery.

Table 3: Allocated resources associated with the Contraventions Act Program

Categories FY 2020–21 FY 2021–22 FY 2022–23 FY 2023–24 FY 2024–25
Operational costsFootnote 1 of Table 3 $388,320 $514,191 $511,520 $707,068 $1,242,261
ContributionsFootnote 2 of Table 3 Footnote 3 of Table 3 $9,094,900 $6,458,000 $7,662,362 $6,947,282 $6,037,220
Total $9,483,220 $6,972,191 $8,173,882 $7,654,350 $7,279,481

It is important to note that Justice Canada does not provide a direct financial contribution to provincial or municipal governments to cover expenditures related to the processing of federal contraventions. Instead, current Contraventions Act agreements include clauses that allow provincial and municipal governments to retain the required portion of fines collected to cover these costs. Any surplus in fines collected is shared equally between the federal and provincial/municipal governments.