Pre-Trial Detention Under the Young Offenders Act: A Study of Urban Courts
APPENDIX: METHOD AND SUPPORTING TABLES (cont'd)
TABLE A.12 - THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL AND LEGAL VARIABLES ON RELEASE FROM DETENTION, EDMONTON
| Variable |
B (s.e.) |
Sign. |
| Constant |
4.383 (1.229) |
.000 |
| Lives with parents vs. others |
.448 (.501) |
.371 |
| No current legal involvement vs. some involvement |
.115 (1.084) |
.916 |
| Any grounds cited (no/either primary or secondary/both) |
-1.486 (.388) |
.000 |
| Both bail history and prior custody (no/yes) |
-.695 (.310) |
.025 |
| Any prior convictions (no/yes) |
-2.853 (1.217) |
.019 |
| Number of current charges |
-.118 (.200) |
.555 |
| Model chi-square (df) |
54.20 (6) *** |
| % correct predictions detained |
81% |
| % correct predictions released |
72% |
| Overall correct predictions |
75% |
| Nagelkerke's R2 |
.48 |
TABLE A.13 -
THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL AND LEGAL VARIABLES ON RELEASE FROM DETENTION, VANCOUVER AND SURREY
| Variable |
B (s.e.) |
Sign. |
| Constant |
2.550 (.613) |
.000 |
| White/other vs. Aboriginal/black |
-.825 (.450) |
.067 |
| Secondary grounds cited (no/yes) |
-.946 (.542) |
.081 |
| 1-2 vs. 3+ current charges |
.357 (.554) |
.519 |
| Number of prior convictions |
-.819 (.153) |
.000 |
| Model chi-square (df) |
52.29 (4) *** |
| % correct predictions detained |
78% |
| % correct predictions released |
81% |
| Overall correct predictions |
81% |
| Nagelkerke's R2 |
.38 |
Table A.14 - B Values and Significant Relationships among Social, Socio-legal and Legal Characteristics and Court Undertakings Not to Communicate with the Victim, by Court Location
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| % of cases where non-communication with victim was a condition |
42% |
28% |
20% |
18% |
31% |
Non-legal (social) factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Being female |
- |
.07 |
-.08 |
-.07 |
-.01 |
| Age |
-.21 |
.07 |
.20* |
-.01 |
.10 |
| Race (black/Aboriginal) |
- |
.15 |
.26** |
na |
-.02 |
Socio-legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Living outside family setting |
- |
-.14 |
-.07 |
-.12 |
-.01 |
Legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Number of prior convictions |
.01 |
- |
- |
-.10 |
-.05* |
| Having prior custody disposition |
- |
-.07 |
-.07 |
.02 |
- |
| Number of current charges |
-.07 |
-.01 |
-.08 |
-.09 |
.03 |
| Person charge at arrest |
.49 *** |
.45 *** |
.31 *** |
.41 *** |
.74 *** |
| Number of cases |
57 |
104 |
94 |
71 |
116 |
| Statistical significance of the anova |
** |
*** |
*** |
** |
*** |
TABLE A.15 - B VALUES AND SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOCIAL, SOCIO-LEGAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COURT UNDERTAKING NOT TO COMMUNICATE WITH OTHER PERSONS, BY COURT LOCATION
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| % of cases where non-communication with victim was a condition |
56% |
37% |
49% |
42% |
33% |
Non-legal (social) factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Being female |
-.22 |
-.12 |
.25 |
.13 |
-.11 |
| Age |
-.20 |
.07 |
.03* |
- |
.10 |
| Race (black/Aboriginal) |
.04 |
.11 |
.03 |
na |
-.06 |
Legal factors
| |
Hal-Dart |
Tor & Scar |
Wpg |
Edm |
Van & Surrey |
| Having a co-accused |
.26 |
.37 *** |
.24 * |
.19 |
.38 *** |
| Presence or number of prior convictions |
.01 |
- |
- |
- |
-.10 |
| Having prior probation breaches |
- |
.22 |
-.07 |
-.13 |
- |
| Having prior administration of justice charges |
-.01 |
- |
-.05 |
- |
- |
| Number of current charges |
- |
.15 * |
-.00 |
- |
.03 |
| Person charge at arrest |
-.33* |
- |
- |
-.44 *** |
.28 ** |
| Bail violation at arrest |
- |
- |
- |
-.50 ** |
- |
| Current charge is indictable |
- |
-.06 |
.28 * |
- |
- |
| Number of cases |
57 |
105 |
95 |
72 |
116 |
| Statistical significance of the anova |
* |
*** |
** |
*** |
*** |
Notes:
- *** p<.001, ** p<.01, * p<.05. If the cell is blank, then the factor was not statistically associated with the condition. "-" means that the variable was not included in the model. "n.a." means the variable was excluded because of missing values.
- The first value in the cell is the unstandardized B coefficient.
- N=125, Cut value=.65
- N=170, Cut value=.70
- Dependent Variable=Was youth released from detention by the youth court? (no/yes)