L’efficacité de la médiation pour certains litiges en matière civile : une méta-analyse

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante

Bibliographie

(L’utilisation d’un * indique que l’étude a été utilisée dans la méta-analyse, tandis qu’un † indique que l’étude a été repérée trop tard pour être prise en compte dans l’étude.)

• *Alternative Dispute Resolution Pilot Project of the Immigration Appeal Division- Pilot Project Final Report, dans Evaluation of the dispute resolution fund: Draft report, Ottawa, ministère de la Justice, 2002.
  
  
• *Anderson, H. et R. Pi. Evaluation of the Early Mediation Pilot Programs, California: Administrative Office of the Courts, Judicial Council of California, 2004.
  
  
• *Antweiler, Werner. Foreign Currency Units per 1 Canadian Dollar, 1948-2005, consultée le 1^er mars 2007 à l’adresse http://fx.sauder.ubc.ca/etc/CADpages.pdf, 2005.
  
  
• *Brett, J. et S. Goldberg. Grievance Mediation in the Coal Industry: A Field Placement, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 37(1): 49-69, 1983.
  
  
• * Delaney, M. et T. Wright. Plaintiff’s Satisfaction With Dispute Resolution Processes: Trial, Arbitration, Pre-Trial Conference and Mediation, Washington: Justice Research Center, 1997.
  
  
• *Dywan, J. An Evaluation of the Effect of Court-Ordered Mediation and Proactive Case Management on the Pace of Civil Tort Litigation in Lake County, Indiana, Journal On Dispute Resolution, 2003.
  
  
• *Eaglin, J. The Pre-Argument Conference Program in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: An Evaluation, Washington: Federal Judicial Center, 1990.
  
  
• *Evaluation of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Pilot Project, Développement des ressources humaines Canada, région de la Nouvelle-Écosse.
  
  
• *Fix, M. et P. Harter. Hard Cases, Vulnerable People: An Analysis of the Mediation Programs at The Multi-Door Courthouse of the Superior Court of DC, Washington: State Justice Institute, 1992.
  
  
• *Genn, H. Central London County Pilot Mediation Scheme, London: Department of Constitutional Affairs Research Series, 1998.
  
  
• Glass, G., B. McGaw et M. Smith. Meta-Analysis in Social Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1981.
  
  
• *Hann, R., C. Baar, L. Axon, S. Binnie et F. Zemans. Evaluation of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1): Final Report- The First 23 Months, Kingston: Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General,2001.
  
  
• *Hanson, R. The Use of Mediation to Resolve Workers Compensation Cases: A Report to the Appellate District of the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ohio: National Center for State Courts, 1997.
  
  
• *Henriques, J. Mediator Versus Moderator Variables, 1999, University of Wisconsin-Madison, dernière mise à jour 1^er mars 1999, consultée le 27 juin 2007 à l’adresse http://psych.wisc.edu/henriques/mediator.html.
  
  
• † Herman, M., G. LaFree, C. Rack et M. West. The MetroCourt Project Final Report: A Study of the Effects of Ethnicity and Gender in Mediated and Adjudicated Small Claims Cases at the Metropolitan Court Mediation Center, University of New Mexico: The Metropolitan Court Mediation Center, 1993.
  
  
• *Hogarth, J. et K. Boyle. UBC Program on Dispute Resolution: Is Mediation a Cost-Effective Alternative in Motor Vehicle Personal Injury Claims? Statistical Analyses and Observations, Vancouver: Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia, 2002.
  
  
• *Kakalik, J. An Evaluation of Mediation and Early Neutral Evaluation Under the Civil Justice Reform Act, California: RAND Institute for Civil Justice, 1996.
  
  
• *Kobbervig, W. Mediation of Civil Cases in Hennepin County: An Evaluation, Minnesota: Office of the State Court Administration, Minnesota Judicial Center, 1991.
  
  
• *Latimer, J., C. Dowden et D. Muise. L’efficacité des pratiques de la justice réparatrice : méta-analyse, ministère de la Justice du Canada, Division de la recherche et de la statistique, 2001.
  
  
• *Latimer, J., C. Dowden et K. Morton-Bourgon, assistés de Edgar, J. et M. Bania. Le traitement des adolescents qui ont des démêlés avec la justice : nouvelle méta-analyse, ministère de la Justice du Canada, Division de la recherche et de la statistique, 2003.
  
  
• *Latimer, J., K. Morton-Bourgon et J. Chrétien. Les tribunaux de traitement de la toxicomanie : méta-analyse — Ont-ils un un effet positif sur les taux de récidive?, ministère de la Justice du Canada, Division de la recherche et de la statistique, 2006.
  
  
• *Lipsey,M. et D. Wilson. The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational, and Behavioral Treatment: Confirmation from Meta-Analysis, American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209, 1993.
  
  
• *Macfarlane, J. Court-Based Mediation for Civil Cases: An Evaluation of the Ontario Court (General Division) ADR Center, Windsor: Faculty of Law, University of Windsor, 1995.
  
  
• *McEwan, C. An Evaluation of the ADR Pilot Project: Final Report, Maine: Maine Superior Court, 1992.
  
  
• *McEwan, C. et R. Maiman. Small Claims Mediation in Maine: An Empirical Assessment, Maine Law Review 33: 237-268, 1981.
  
  
• *Mediation and Conflict Resolution Office. Different Types of Mediation Styles, 2007, consultée le 18 juin 2007 à l’adresse http://www.peoples-law.org/core/mediation/adr_directory/mediation_approaches.htm.
  
  
• *Roehl, J., R. Hersch et E. Llaneras. Civil Case Mediation and Comprehensive Justice Centers: Process, Quality of Justice, and Value to State Courts: Executive Summary, New Jersey: State Justice Institute, 1992.
  
  
• *Rosenthal, R. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Newbury, CA: Sage, 1991.
  
  
• † Schultz, Karl D. Florida’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Demonstration Project: An Empirical Assessment, Tallahassee, Florida: Florida Dispute Resolution Center, 1990.
  
  
• *Slack, L. A Comparative Analysis on the Benefits of Mediation in the Cobb County Superior Court, Georgia: Institute for Court Management, Cobb County Superior Court, 1996.
  
  
• *Small Claims Mediation in Three Urban Courts, dans Small Claims and Traffic Courts: Case Management Procedures, Case Characteristics, and Outcomes in 12 Urban Jurisdictions, Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts, 1992.
  
  
• *Sourdin, T. et T. Matruglio. Evaluating Mediation - New South Wales Settlement Scheme 2002, Sydney: La Trobe University, University of Western Sydney, 2002.
  
  
• Starr & Starr, PLLC. FAQ: Civil Litigation Questions: 5. What is Motion Practise?, 2006, consultée le 18 juin  2007 à l’adresse http://www.starrandstarr.com/faqs.htm#46.
  
  
• *Stevens, C., Ellen, E. et K. McCormick. Court-Ordered Civil Case Mediation in North Carolina: An Evaluation of its Effects, North Carolina: Institute for Government, University of North Carolina à Chapel Hill, 1995.
  
  
• *Stienstra, D., M. Johnson et P. Lombard. The Western District of Missouri’s Early Assessment Program, dans Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management: A Study of the Five Demonstration Programs Established Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, Washington: Federal Judicial Center, 1997.
  
  
• *Wissler, R. Mediation and Adjudication in the Small Claims Court: The Effects of Process and Case Characteristics, Law and Society Review 29(2): 323-358, 1995.
  
  
• *Zweibel, E., J. Macfarlane et J. Manwaring. Négociations de solutions aux conflits en milieu de travail : évaluation du projet-pilote de médiation des griefs de la Commission des relations de travail dans la fonction publique, rapport final, Ottawa, Commission des relations de travail dans la fonction publique, 2001.
  
  

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante